Streszczenie. W latach pięćdziesiątych Gagliardo wykazał, że dla obszaru $\Omega$ z
regularnym brzegiem operator śladu z przestrzeni Sobolewa
$W^1_1(\Omega)$ do przestrzeni $L^1(\partial \Omega)$ jest surjekcją.
Zatem naturalne jest pytanie o istnienie prawego odwrotnego operatora
do operatora śladu. Petree udowodnił, że w przypadku półpłaszczyzny
$\mathbb{R}x\mathbb{R}_{+}$ nie istnieje prawy odwrotny operator do
operatora śladu. Podczas referatu przedstawię prosty dowód twierdzenia
Petree, który wykorzystuje tylko pokrycie Whitney'a danego obszaru
oraz klasyczne własności przestrzeni Banacha. Następnie zdefiniujemy
operator śladu z przestrzeni Sobolewa $W^1_1(K)$, gdzie $K$ jest
płatkiem Kocha. Przez pozostałą część mojego referatu skonstruujemy
prawy odwrotny do operatora śladu na płatku Kocha. W tym celu
scharakteryzujemy przestrzeń śladów jako przestrzeń Arensa-Eelsa z
odpowiednią metryką oraz skorzystamy z twierdzenia Ciesielskiego o
przestrzeniach funkcji hölderowskich.
Entropy Weighted Regularisation: A General Way to Debias Regularisation Penalties
Olof Zetterqvist (University of Gothenburg/Chalmers)
Lasso and ridge regression are well established and successful models for variance reduction and, for the lasso, variable selection. However, they come with a disadvantage of an increased bias in the estimator. In this seminar, I will talk about our general method that learns individual weights for each term in the regularisation penalty (e.g. lasso or ridge) with the goal to reduce the bias. To bound the amount of freedom for the model to choose the weights, a new regularisation term, that imposes a cost for choosing small weights, is introduced. If the form of this term is chosen wisely, the apparent doubling of the number of parameters vanishes, by means of solving for the weights in terms of the parameter estimates. We show that these estimators potentially keep the original estimators’ fundamental properties and experimentally verify that this can indeed reduce bias.
In this talk we present closed formulas for the conditional expectation of resolvents of arbitrary non-commutative polynomials in free random variables onto the subalgebras generated by subsets of the variables. More precisely, given a linearization of the resolvent we compute a linearization of its conditional expectation. The coefficients of the expressions obtained in this process involve certain Boolean cumulant functionals, which can be computed by solving a system of matrix equations.
Virtual combination of relatively quasiconvex subgroups and separability properties
Ashot Minasyan
Quasiconvex subgroups are basic building blocks of hyperbolic groups, and relatively quasiconvex subgroups play a similar role in relatively hyperbolic groups. If $Q$ and $R$ are relatively quasiconvex subgroups of a relatively hyperbolic group $G$ then the intersection $Q \cap R$ will also be relatively quasiconvex, but the join $\langle Q,R \rangle$ may not be. I will discuss criteria for the existence of finite index subgroups $Q’ \leqslant_f Q$ and $R’ \leqslant_f R$ such that the ``virtual join’’ $\langle Q’, R’ \rangle$ is relatively quasiconvex. This is closely related to separability properties of $G$ and I will present applications to limit groups, Kleinian groups and fundamental groups of graphs of free groups with cyclic edge groups. The talk will be based on joint work with Lawk Mineh.
Bohr compactification and type-definable connected component of modules, rings and semidirect product of groups
Mateusz Rzepecki
For a model M and a topological space C we say that a map f: M -> C is definable if for any two disjoint closed sets in C their preimages by f are separable by a definable set.
For a definable structure N in a model M we say that f is a definable compactification of N if f is a compactification of N and f is a definable map.
We say that a definable compactification of N is universal if every definable compactification of N factors by f via a continuous map.
It turns out that if N is a group (Gismatullin, Penazzi & Pillay) or a ring (Gismatullin, Jagiella & Krupiński) then N/N^{00}_M is the universal definable compactification of N, where N^{00}_M is the type-definable connected component of N over M.
A module can be represented as N in two ways. The first one is a definable abelian group and a ring that is a part of the language. The second one is a definable abelian group and a definable ring.
This talk: In this talk we will prove that for a definable module N (in both senses) N/N^00_M is a universal definable compactification of N (the definition of N^00_M for a module will be given). We will also analyze how N^00_M depends on the type-definable connected component of the abelian group. To do this we will prove a theorem that shows how connected components help in creating sets that are closed under commutative addition (generalization of the proof by Krzysztof Krupiński for approximate rings). Using the theorem, we will describe the type-definable connected component of modules, rings and semidirect products of groups. We will also show that in many cases of structures analyzed during this talk adding homomorphism/monomorphism/automorphism/differentiation to the structure N does not change the type-definable connected component of N. During the talk we will come across a few open questions.
This is a joint work with Krzysztof Krupiński and is a part of a bigger project with Grzegorz Jagiella.
W referacie opowiemy o najnowszych wynikach dotyczących asymptotyk warunkowego czasu przebywania nad wysoką barierą przez odbite procesy Gaussowskie o stacjonarnych przyrostach. Referat oparty jest na wspólnych pracach z E. Hashorvą (University of Lausanne), G. Jasnovidovem (University Of Lausanne), P. Liu (University of Essex), Z. Michną (Politechnika Wrocławska).
The Maximality Principle (introduced by Hamkins) asserts that
any forceably necessary statement is true. The Recurrence Axiom
(introduced by Fuchino and Usuba) asserts that any forceable statement
is true in some ground, where an inner model W is said to be a ground
if VV is a set-sized forcing extension of W. In this talk, we will
explore natural variants of these principles by restricting the
complexity of statements, allowing parameters, and varying the class of
forcing posets. For example, we discuss the (in)compatibility of these
variants with the Ground Axiom (introduced by Hamkins and Reitz), which
asserts that there are no non-trivial grounds. This talk is based on
joint work with Sakaé Fuchino and Francesco Parente.